Can you crack it? (nope, I tried though)

The UK govt created a challenge to find eligible code crackers. The website is http://www.canyoucrackit.co.uk/.

I got close, but my skills aren't up to par. Here is as far as I got. They give you the following code:

eb 04 af c2 bf a3 81 ec  00 01 00 00 31 c9 88 0c
0c fe c1 75 f9 31 c0 ba  ef be ad de 02 04 0c 00
d0 c1 ca 08 8a 1c 0c 8a  3c 04 88 1c 04 88 3c 0c
fe c1 75 e8 e9 5c 00 00  00 89 e3 81 c3 04 00 00
00 5c 58 3d 41 41 41 41  75 43 48 3d 42 42 42 42
75 3b 5a 89 d1 89 e6 89  df 29 cf f3 a4 89 de 89
d1 89 df 29 cf 31 c0 31  db 31 d2 fe c0 02 1c 06
8a 14 06 8a 34 1e 88 34  06 88 14 1e 00 f2 30 f6
8a 1c 16 8a 17 30 da 88  17 47 49 75 de 31 db 89
d8 fe c0 cd 80 90 90 e8  9d ff ff ff 41 41 41 41

What jumps out at me first are the nops (90 90) in the last line. My mind automagically tells me this is shellcode. I wasn't 100% sure, but it was the only guess I had. I copied the code over into gedit, and made the following adjustments.

\xeb\x04\xaf\xc2\xbf\xa3\x81\xec\x00\x01\x00\x00\x31\xc9\x88\x0c
\x0c\xfe\xc1\x75\xf9\x31\xc0\xba\xef\xbe\xad\xde\x02\x04\x0c\x00
\xd0\xc1\xca\x08\x8a\x1c\x0c\x8a\x3c\x04\x88\x1c\x04\x88\x3c\x0c
\xfe\xc1\x75\xe8\xe9\x5c\x00\x00\x00\x89\xe3\x81\xc3\x04\x00\x00
\x00\x5c\x58\x3d\x41\x41\x41\x41\x75\x43\x48\x3d\x42\x42\x42\x42
\x75\x3b\x5a\x89\xd1\x89\xe6\x89\xdf\x29\xcf\xf3\xa4\x89\xde\x89
\xd1\x89\xdf\x29\xcf\x31\xc0\x31\xdb\x31\xd2\xfe\xc0\x02\x1c\x06
\x8a\x14\x06\x8a\x34\x1e\x88\x34\x06\x88\x14\x1e\x00\xf2\x30\xf6
\x8a\x1c\x16\x8a\x17\x30\xda\x88\x17\x47\x49\x75\xde\x31\xdb\x89
\xd8\xfe\xc0\xcd\x80\x90\x90\xe8\x9d\xff\xff\xff\x41\x41\x41\x41

I then saved this into a shellcode.c file:

char shellcode[] = "\xeb\x04\xaf\xc2\xbf\xa3\x81\xec\x00\x01\x00\x00\x31\xc9\x88\x0c\x0c\xfe\xc1\x75\xf9\x31\xc0\xba\xef\xbe\xad\xde\x02\x04\x0c\x00\xd0\xc1\xca\x08\x8a\x1c\x0c\x8a\x3c\x04\x88\x1c\x04\x88\x3c\x0c\xfe\xc1\x75\xe8\xe9\x5c\x00\x00\x00\x89\xe3\x81\xc3\x04\x00\x00\x00\x5c\x58\x3d\x41\x41\x41\x41\x75\x43\x48\x3d\x42\x42\x42\x42\x75\x3b\x5a\x89\xd1\x89\xe6\x89\xdf\x29\xcf\xf3\xa4\x89\xde\x89\xd1\x89\xdf\x29\xcf\x31\xc0\x31\xdb\x31\xd2\xfe\xc0\x02\x1c\x06\x8a\x14\x06\x8a\x34\x1e\x88\x34\x06\x88\x14\x1e\x00\xf2\x30\xf6\x8a\x1c\x16\x8a\x17\x30\xda\x88\x17\x47\x49\x75\xde\x31\xdb\x89\xd8\xfe\xc0\xcd\x80\x90\x90\xe8\x9d\xff\xff\xff\x41\x41\x41\x41";

void main() {
   int *ret;

   ret = (int *)&ret + 2;
   (*ret) = (int)shellcode;

   printf("done");

}

Running it simply returned the "done" being printed by printf. This told me that the shellcode was at least not crashing, so it was probably valid shellcode. Looks like my first impression was correct. So I jumped to the asm that the shellcode produced to get a better understanding of it:

0000000000601040 :
  601040: eb 04                 jmp    601046 
  601042: af                    scas   %es:(%rdi),%eax
  601043: c2 bf a3              retq   $0xa3bf
  601046: 81 ec 00 01 00 00     sub    $0x100,%esp
  60104c: 31 c9                 xor    %ecx,%ecx
  60104e: 88 0c 0c              mov    %cl,(%rsp,%rcx,1)
  601051: fe c1                 inc    %cl
  601053: 75 f9                 jne    60104e 
  601055: 31 c0                 xor    %eax,%eax
  601057: ba ef be ad de        mov    $0xdeadbeef,%edx
  60105c: 02 04 0c              add    (%rsp,%rcx,1),%al
  60105f: 00 d0                 add    %dl,%al
  601061: c1 ca 08              ror    $0x8,%edx
  601064: 8a 1c 0c              mov    (%rsp,%rcx,1),%bl
  601067: 8a 3c 04              mov    (%rsp,%rax,1),%bh
  60106a: 88 1c 04              mov    %bl,(%rsp,%rax,1)
  60106d: 88 3c 0c              mov    %bh,(%rsp,%rcx,1)
  601070: fe c1                 inc    %cl
  601072: 75 e8                 jne    60105c 
  601074: e9 5c 00 00 00        jmpq   6010d5 
  601079: 89 e3                 mov    %esp,%ebx
  60107b: 81 c3 04 00 00 00     add    $0x4,%ebx
  601081: 5c                    pop    %rsp
  601082: 58                    pop    %rax
  601083: 3d 41 41 41 41        cmp    $0x41414141,%eax
  601088: 75 43                 jne    6010cd 
  60108a: 48 3d 42 42 42 42     cmp    $0x42424242,%rax
  601090: 75 3b                 jne    6010cd 
  601092: 5a                    pop    %rdx
  601093: 89 d1                 mov    %edx,%ecx
  601095: 89 e6                 mov    %esp,%esi
  601097: 89 df                 mov    %ebx,%edi
  601099: 29 cf                 sub    %ecx,%edi
  60109b: f3 a4                 rep movsb %ds:(%rsi),%es:(%rdi)
  60109d: 89 de                 mov    %ebx,%esi
  60109f: 89 d1                 mov    %edx,%ecx
  6010a1: 89 df                 mov    %ebx,%edi
  6010a3: 29 cf                 sub    %ecx,%edi
  6010a5: 31 c0                 xor    %eax,%eax
  6010a7: 31 db                 xor    %ebx,%ebx
  6010a9: 31 d2                 xor    %edx,%edx
  6010ab: fe c0                 inc    %al
  6010ad: 02 1c 06              add    (%rsi,%rax,1),%bl
  6010b0: 8a 14 06              mov    (%rsi,%rax,1),%dl
  6010b3: 8a 34 1e              mov    (%rsi,%rbx,1),%dh
  6010b6: 88 34 06              mov    %dh,(%rsi,%rax,1)
  6010b9: 88 14 1e              mov    %dl,(%rsi,%rbx,1)
  6010bc: 00 f2                 add    %dh,%dl
  6010be: 30 f6                 xor    %dh,%dh
  6010c0: 8a 1c 16              mov    (%rsi,%rdx,1),%bl
  6010c3: 8a 17                 mov    (%rdi),%dl
  6010c5: 30 da                 xor    %bl,%dl
  6010c7: 88 17                 mov    %dl,(%rdi)
  6010c9: 47                    rex.RXB
  6010ca: 49 75 de              rex.WB jne    6010ab 
  6010cd: 31 db                 xor    %ebx,%ebx
  6010cf: 89 d8                 mov    %ebx,%eax
  6010d1: fe c0                 inc    %al
  6010d3: cd 80                 int    $0x80
  6010d5: 90                    nop
  6010d6: 90                    nop
  6010d7: e8 9d ff ff ff        callq  601079 
  6010dc: 41                    rex.B
  6010dd: 41                    rex.B
  6010de: 41                    rex.B
  6010df: 41 00 00              add    %al,(%r8)

Definitely legitimate shellcode. The x86 asm gcc spits out is exactly what I wanted to see. Not only that, but do you see the 0xdeadbeef?

Once I knew I was in the right direction, I loaded the binary into gdb. I through a breakpoint on the printf line with

break printf

and ran the binary. I looked at the stack frame, traversed through the memory and found the strings I suspected were what we were supposed to be looking for. However, they seemed to be all multi-byte characters. I wasn't able to decipher any of them within the time limit. I had found out about the contest about 2 hours before it was over. This took me about an hour to get to traversing the stack for the strings, and I got stuck.

Oh well. Maybe next time if I have more time I can get a bit further.

Easily splitting and storing traceroute data

Traceroute is very useful, but the data it spits out can be a bit tough to chew on. I came up with this one-liner to make it more CSV compatible so you can Split() on commas and have the correct data where you expect it.

traceroute google.com | sed 's/  /,/g' | sed 's/ ms / ms,/g'

This take load balancers into account as well, so when your route slightly changes during a hop, you can still easily grok the data coming back. Basically, take double-spaces and replace them with a comma. The second sed is what takes the load balancers into account, fixing the output so it is the same as the prior hop test.

My NHibernate Configuration for Mono and PostgreSQL

I love C#. It is by far my favorite language. I have been using mono to write C# application on linux for a few years now.

Ruby is growing on me, but only because of Metasploit. I wouldn't even bother with Ruby if it weren't for MSF. Generally, I switch back and forth between C# and Ruby (and, coincidentally, Monodevelop and vim respectively) a few times a day, or even going at both at the same time.

One of my personal projects requires a lot of DB stuff. At a previous job, I was introduced to NHibernate, this is by far the easiest way to manage your DB objects within your code. While this job was Windows centric (MSSQL, visual studio, etc...), I have adapted what I learned to Linux as well. I like PostgreSQL more than I like MySQL, and am very happy that NHibernate supports this dialect. It wasn't straight forward, though, figuring out the exact details. Maybe this will help someone in the same boat I am in.

The most important thing is you hibernate.hbm.xml. This is where you SQL connection string is, and where you tell NHibernate what dialect of SQL you are using:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hibernate-configuration  xmlns="urn:nhibernate-configuration-2.2" >
    <session-factory>
        <property name="connection.provider">NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider</property>
        <property name="connection.driver_class">NHibernate.Driver.NpgsqlDriver</property>
        <property name="connection.connection_string">
            Server=192.168.1.156;Port=5432;Database=pgdb;User Id=postgres;Password=postgres;SSL=true;
        </property>
        <property name="dialect">NHibernate.Dialect.PostgreSQL82Dialect</property>
  <property name='proxyfactory.factory_class'>NHibernate.ByteCode.LinFu.ProxyFactoryFactory, NHibernate.ByteCode.LinFu</property>
    </session-factory>
</hibernate-configuration>

This requires Npgsql.dll, which runs with Mono just fine. The small detail that caused me much stress early on was the dialect property name.

<property name="dialect">NHibernate.Dialect.PostgreSQL82Dialect</property>

At first, I was missing the "82" in the middle of the dialect name. This defaults to PostgreSQL 7.4. I am running 8.4, and there were incompatibilities that caused issues. After a day or two, I finally figured out what was causing my problems.

I hope this helps others.

Metasploit and the Penetration Testing Execution Standard

I was recently asked to map out the Metasploit Framework's functionality with the PTES.

Have a look at the whitepaper, if you are interested in Metasploit or network security, it should be a great read.

www.tinyurl.com/msf-ptes

CorpWatch API integration with Metasploit: Information Gathering

I have submitted two modules today to the Metasploit redmine that allow integration of the CorpWatch API. They are very neat modules, allowing you to bring in information from SEC EDGAR straight into Metasploit without leaving the console. You can find and research parent and child companies, view past addresses, past names, SEC filings, all sorts of valuable information with gathering information on a company during an engagement.

Here is an example run: http://pastebin.com/d9MKjiQ2

Hopefully these modules will hit trunk soon, but if you want to play with them now, the diff is taken from the framework root.